Preview

General Reanimatology

Advanced search

Sepsis: A Brief Overview of the Key Concepts

https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2025-3-2566

Abstract

The issue of sepsis has been discussed extensively in the medical and scientific community for decades. However, a unified understanding of the biological nature of this condition has yet to be established.

Aim. To provide a structured review of the key concepts commonly used in clinical practice and in the scientific literature related to sepsis.

Materials and Methods. A review of the scientific literature combined with the authors' professional experience.

Results. From a methodological perspective, it is suggested to conceptualize sepsis as a pathological condition due to generalized suppurative process. In this case, typical sepsis and septic shock are proposed to be considered two pathogenically separate, independently developing anatomo-clinical forms of sepsis.

Conclusion. It is proposed to consider as sepsis only conditions associated with pathogens that are not capable of causing purulent inflammation. Non–purulent conditions not associated with pathogens of purulent infections are considered as generalization of bacterial, viral, protozoal, fungal diseases that may acquire toxic and especially toxic clinical forms designated as bacterial-toxic, or infectious-toxic (but not septic) shock. Typical sepsis and septic shock are proposed to be considered as independently developing clinical and anatomical forms of sepsis rather than the sequentially developing stages of the pathological condition.

About the Authors

P. G. Malkov
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Pavel G. Malkov

1 Leninskiye gory Str., 119991 Moscow



G. A. Frank
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Georgy A. Frank

2/1 Barricadnaiay Str., Bldg. 1, 125993 Moscow

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57212995964



References

1. Singer M., Deuschman C. S., Seymour C. W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R., et al. The Third International Consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315 (8): 801–810. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PMID: 26903338.

2. Improving the prevention, diagnosis, and clinical management of sepsis. Report of the Executive Committee of the World Health Organization on item 7.2 of the provisional agenda for the 140th session of the Executive Committee (EB 140/12). 2017. (in Russ.). https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB140/B140_12-ru.pdf.

3. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: The tenth revision. The World Health Organization. 1992, 2003, 2021. The official publication in Russian in 3 volumes. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 07.04. 2021. (in Russ.).

4. Shankar-Hari M., Phillips G. S., Levy M. L., Seymour C. W., Liu V. X., Deutschman C. S., Angus D. C., et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315 (8): 775–787. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289. PMID: 26903336.

5. Davydovsky I. V. Sepsis. In: Pathological anatomy and pathogenesis of human diseases. Volume 1. Infectious diseases. Moscow: Medgiz; 1956: 541–574. (in Russ.).

6. Davydovsky I. V. Purulent-resorptive fever. In: Pathological anatomy and pathogenesis of human diseases. Volume 1. Infectious diseases. Moscow: Medgiz; 1956: 574–595. (in Russ.).

7. Rybakova M. G. Sepsis: from systemic inflammatory response syndrome to organ dysfunction. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology = Arkhiv Patologii. 2021; 83 (1): 67–72. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/patol20218301167.

8. Cherkasova M. N. On the problem of experimental modeling of sepsis. The Successes of Modern Biology = Uspekhi Sovremennoy Biologii. 2021; 141 (4): 368–381. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0042132421030054.

9. Rittirsch D., Hoesel L. M., Ward P. A. The disconnect between animal models of sepsis and human sepsis. J Leukoc Biol. 2007; 81 (1): 137–143. DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0806542. PMID: 17020929.

10. Parkhomenko Yu. G. Sepsis: state of the art, diagnosis and disputable problems of classification. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology = Arkhiv Patologii. 2005; 67 (6): 53–57. (in Russ.).

11. Mishnev O. D., Grinberg L. M., Zairatyants O. V. Actual problems of the pathology of sepsis: 25 years in search of a consensus. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology = Arkhiv Patologii. 2016; 78 (6): 3–8. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/patol20167.


Review

For citations:


Malkov P.G., Frank G.A. Sepsis: A Brief Overview of the Key Concepts. General Reanimatology. 2025;21(3):51-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2025-3-2566

Views: 381


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-9779 (Print)
ISSN 2411-7110 (Online)