Choice of Anesthesia Mode, Neuroprotective Therapy in the Surgical Repair of Extracranial Vessels
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-5-20
Abstract
Objective: to improve the direct results of carotid endarterectomy, by reducing the number of perioperative complications via the choice of an anesthesia mode and a neuroprotective regimen for possible neurological complications. Subjects and methods. Total intravenous diprivan anesthesia versus regional cervical plexus anesthesia after Pashchuk and inhaled sevorane anesthesia was evaluated in 190 patients with carotid endarterectomy. The parameters of cerebral blood flow and the markers for brain damage were studied. Results. Sevorane anesthesia has been shown to maintain optimal cerebral blood flow, which limits ischemia and reperfusion brain damages and results in fewer postoperative complications. Neurological disorders were an indication for neuroprotective therapy and, according to which, the patients were divided into 2 matched groups. Therapy with mexidol and cytoflavin, which had already become traditional, was used in Group 1. Group 2 patients were given the current neuroprotective agent citicoline (ceraxone) with actovegin. The performed trials showed that the neuroprotective therapy used in Group 2 was more effective (5% significance level) than that in Group 1. Conclusion. Inhalational sevorane anesthesia versus total intravenous diprivan anesthesia and regional cervical plexus anesthesia is characterized by optimal cerebral blood flow values, less neuronal damage, and fewer postoperative neurological complications. Irrespective of the mode of anesthesia, neuroprotective therapy involving ceraxone in combination with actovegin is preferred for the intensive therapy of postoperative neurological disorders. Key words: diprivan, sevorane, neuron-specific enolase, linear cerebral blood flow velocity, carotid endarterectomy, cerebral perfusion pressure, brain-specific protein antibodies, ceraxone.
References
1. Dahl T., Aasland J., Romundstad P. et al.
2. Barnett H. J., Taylor D. W., Eliasziw M. et al.Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998; 339 (20): 1415—1425.
3. Lehot J. J., Durand P. G.Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Rev Esp. Anestesiol Reanim. 2001; 48 (10): 499—507.
4. Бабаян Е., Зельман В. Л, Полушин Ю. С., Щёголев А. В.Защита мозга от ишемии: состояние проблемы. Анестезиология и реаниматология 2005; 4: 4-1
5. Ившин А. А, Гуменюк Е. Г, Шифман Е. М.Диагностика нарушений церебральной артериальной гемодинамики у беременных с тяжелой преэклампсией. Росс. вестн. акушера-гинеколога 2005; 5 (1): 4—8.
6. Belfort M. A., Varner M. W, Dizon-Townson D. S. et al.Cerebral perfu-sion pressure, and not cerebral blood flow, may be the critical determinant of intracranial injury in preeclampsia: a new hypothesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 187 (3): 626—634.
7. Гусев Н. Б.Внутриклеточные Са-связывающие белки. Соросовский образовательный журнал 1998;5: 2—9.
8. Ребенко Н. М., Аутеншлюс А. И., Абрамов В. В. и соавт.Уровни антител к энцефалотогенному протеину как критерий степени тяжести у больных с острым ишемическим инсультом. Нейроиммуноло-гия 2003; 1 (4): 23—26.
9. Dahlen U., Karlsson B., Nilsson O. et al.Enzymun test for determination of neu-ron-specifie enolase. XXIII International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. Montreal, Quebec; 1995. 113—11
10. Епифанцева Н. Н., Борщикова Т. И., Чурляев Ю. А. и соавт.Сывороточные маркёры апоптоза при травматическом и ишемическом повреждении головного мозга. Общая реаниматология 2009; V (6): 54—59.
11. Brott T., Adams H. P., Olinger C. P. et al.Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20 (7): 864—870.
12. Федин А. И., Румянцева С. А.Интенсивная терапия ишемического инсульта. Руководство для врачей. М.: МИГ Медицинская книга; 2004. 281.
13. Tazaki Y., Sakai F., Otomo E. et al.Treatment of acute cerebral infarction with a cholin precursor in a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled study. Stroke 1988; 19 (2): 211—216.
14. Saver J. L., Wilterdink J.Choline precursors in acute and subacute human stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2002; 33 (1): 353—364.
15. Гланц С.Медико-биологическая статистика. М.: Практика; 1998. 459.
Review
For citations:
Neimark M.I., Shmelev V.V., Simagin V.Yu., Elizaryev A.Yu., Subbotin E.A. Choice of Anesthesia Mode, Neuroprotective Therapy in the Surgical Repair of Extracranial Vessels . General Reanimatology. 2011;7(5):20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-5-20
Views:
986
Email this article 