Preview

General Reanimatology

Advanced search

Prognostic Index for Compensation of Reduced Heart and Lung Functions in Patients with Sepsis

https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2026-3-2698

Abstract

Magnitude of heart rate (HR) fluctuation during sepsis and septic shock can significantly impact tissue perfusion and organ dysfunction.

The aim of the study is to examine and compare the predictive characteristics of a composite index based on clinical parameters and demographic variables for early risk stratification of mortality in patients with sepsis.

Materials and Methods. In a multicenter retrospective cohort study, data from 257 patients with sepsis or septic shock were analyzed, including age, sex, height, weight, severity of illness, comorbidities, bedside hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring parameters upon admission to the ICU, and 3 hours after the initiation of intensive therapy, as well as treatment outcomes. Statistical characteristics of the generated Prognostic Index for Compensation of Reduced Cardiorespiratory Function (PICRCF) were assessed, calculated as the ratio of the product obtained by multiplying heart rate by respiratory rate and by age to the product obtained by multiplying of diastolic blood pressure by body surface area (BSA). To identify clinical and laboratory predictors of fatal outcomes, all patients were divided into two groups: survivors and those who died during treatment.

Results. The hospital mortality rate in the analyzed patient sample was 48%. Differences were found between those who died and those who survived in terms of age, scores on the Glasgow (RR), heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP), as well as PICRCF values both upon admission ((PICRCF 0) and after 3 hours of intensive care ((PICRCF 3). Notably, (PICRCF 3 demonstrated the highest discriminative performance among all studied predictors (AUC 0.800; 95% CI 0.744–0.855) with a cutoff value of 1.1 (sensitivity 69%, specificity 85%). In the Cox proportional hazards model, (PICRCF 3 was the only independent predictor of mortality (OR 1.313 (95% CI 1.062–1.623), p = 0.012). Additionally, PICRCF values were associated with the number of days without organ replacement support.

Conclusion. The indicators reflecting the state of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, indexed according to anthropometric and age characteristics, have several advantages over standard prognostic scales in the early risk stratification of patients with sepsis. The simplicity, accessibility, and rapid measuring of the components for calculating PICRCF allow for dynamic assessment of the patient's condition from the first minutes of admission to the ICU.

About the Authors

S. A. Andreychenko
Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technology, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia; Academy of Postgraduate Education, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation

Sergey A. Andreychenko 

Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation

28 Orekhovy bulvar, 115682 Moscow; 
91 Volokolamskoe Highway, 125371 Moscow



D. O. Ovcharov
Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technology, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitry O. Ovcharov

28 Orekhovy bulvar, 115682 Moscow



K. V. Yatskov
Moscow Clinical Science and Research Center 52, Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

Konstantin V. Yatskov

3 Pekhotnaya Str., 123182 Moscow



G. N. Arbolishvili
Moscow Clinical Science and Research Center 52, Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

Georgy N. Arbolishvili 

3 Pekhotnaya Str., 123182 Moscow



M. A. Rakhmanov
Academy of Postgraduate Education, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
Russian Federation

Maxim A. Rakhmanov

91 Volokolamskoe Highway, 125371 Moscow



T. V. Klypa
Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technology, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia; Academy of Postgraduate Education, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation

Tatyana V. Klypa

Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation

28 Orekhovy bulvar, 115682 Moscow; 
91 Volokolamskoe Highway, 125371 Moscow



References

1. Bagnenko S. F., Gorobets E. S., Gusarov V. G., Dekhnich A. V., Dibirov M. D., Ershova O. N., Zamyatin M. N., et al. Clinical guidelines «Sepsis (in adults)». Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation=Vestnik Anesthesiologii i Reanimatologii. 2025; 22 (1): 80–109. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-1-81-109.

2. Ramasco F., Nieves-Alonso J., García-Villabona E., Vallejo C., Kattan E., Méndez R. et al. Challenges in septic shock: from new hemodynamics to blood purification therapies. Jf Pers Med. 2024; 14 (2): 176. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020176. PMID: 38392609.

3. Belfiore J., Taddei, R. & Biancofiore, G. Catecholamines in sepsis: pharmacological insights and clinical applications — a narrative review. J Anesth Analg Critl Care. 2025; 5 (1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00241-2. PMID: 40176108.

4. Morelli A., Singer M., Ranieri V. M., D’Egidio A., Mascia L., Orecchioni A., Piscioneri F., et al. Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42: 1528–1534. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2. PMID: 27101380.

5. Carrara M., Bollen Pinto B., Basell G., Bendjelid K., Ferrario M. Baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure variability can help in understanding the different response to therapy during acute phase of septic shock. Shock. 2018; 50: 78–86. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001046. PMID: 29112634.

6. Ospina-Tascón G. A., Teboul J. L., Hernandez G., Alvarez I., Sánchez-Ortiz A. I., Calderón-Tapia L. E., Manzano-Nunez R., et al. Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Ann. Intensive Care. 2020; 10: 41. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00658-8. PMID: 32296976.

7. Paiva M., Carvalho R. A., Brizido C., Bello A. R., Lima M. R., Domingues M., Pereira J. C., et al. Diastolic shock index: a novel prognostic parameter unveiling insights into vasodilatory cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2024; 45 (1) ehae666.1734. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1734.

8. Owattanapanich N., Boonchana N. Diastolic shock index: its importance and application in critically ill patients: a narrative review. Clin CritCare. 2025; 33: Article ID e250005. DOI: 10.54205/ccc.v33.270310.

9. de Simone G., Devereux R. B., Kimball T. R., Roman M. J., Palmier V., Celentano A., Daniels S. R. Relation of heart rate to left ventricular dimensions in normotensive, normal-weight children, adolescents and adults. Ital Heart J. 2001; 2: 599–604. PMID: 11577834.

10. Lin S., Yang X. Body surface area is a predictor of 90-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Injury 2024; 55 (6): 111544. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111544. PMID: 38626586.

11. Chang H., Liao L., Wang W., Pinhu L. Body surface area as a prognostic predictor in patients with sepsis. 2022. License CC BY 4.0. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3 rs-1888518/v1.

12. Zafrir B., Salman N., Crespo-Leiro M. G., Anker S. D., Coats A. J., Ferrari R., Filippatos G., et al. Body surface area as a prognostic marker in chronic heart failure patients: results from the heart failure registry of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18 (7): 859–868. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.551. PMID: 27198159.

13. Nes, B. M., Janszky I., Wisløff U., Støylen A., Karlsen T. Age‐predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects: the HUNT Fitness Study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 23: 697–704. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01445.x. PMID: 22376273.

14. Lupón J., Domingo M., de Antonio M., Zamora E., Santesmases J., Díez-Quevedo C., Altimir S., et al. Aging and heart rate in heart failure: clinical implications for long-term mortality. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90: 765–772. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.02.019. PMID: 26046411.

15. Aglen S. A. S., Simonsen H. F., Sjøset T. E., Jammer I. Respiratory rate as a predictor of clinical deterioration and mortality: a scoping review. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2025; 69 (8): e70113. DOI: 10.1111/aas.70113. PMID: 40828518.

16. Zhang T. Y., Du Y. J., Hou Y. Z., Du Q., Dou H. R., Gao X. M. Heart/breathing rate ratio [HBR] as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients. Heliyon. 2024; 10 (10): e31187. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31187. PMID: 38803872.

17. Singer M., Deutschman C. S., Seymour C. W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R. et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315 (8): 801–810. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PMID: 26903338.

18. La Via L, Sangiorgio G., Stefani S., Marino A., Nunnari G., Cocuzza S., La Mantia I., et al. The global burden of sepsis and septic shock. Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024; 5 (3): 456–478. DOI: 10.3390/epidemiologia5030032. PMID: 39189251.

19. Shvilkina T., Shapiro N. Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: heterogeneity of functional effects and clinical significance. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10: 1200441. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1200441. PMID: 37522079.

20. Shen Y., Wang J., Cao Q., Wu Y., Wang Q., Wang N., Shao M. Maximum heart rate and mortality in sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study. Intern Emerg Med. 2025; 21 (2): 621–630. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-025-03960-0. PMID: 40358822.

21. Evans L., Rhodes A., Alhazzani W., Antonelli M., Coopersmith C. M., French C., Machado F. R., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021; 47: 1181–1247. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. PMID: 34599691.

22. Allgöwer M., Burri, C. «Schockindex». Dtsch Med Wochenchr. 1967; 92 (43): 1947–1950. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1106070. PMID: 5299769.

23. Jouffroy R., Pierre Tourtier J., Gueye P., Bloch-Laine E., Bounes V., Debaty G., Boularan J., et al. Prehospital shock index to assess 28-day mortality for septic shock. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38: 1352–1356. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.004. PMID: 31836349.

24. Torabi M., Moeinaddini S., Mirafzal A., Rastegari A., Sadeghkhani N. Shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index for prediction of mortality in Emergency Severity Index level 3. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34: 2079–2083. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.017. PMID: 27461887.

25. Yu T., Tian C., Song J., He D., Sun Z., Sun Z. Age shock Index is superior to shock index and modified shock index for predicting long-term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction. Shock. 2017; 48: 545–550. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000892. PMID: 28481840.

26. Jouffroy R., Gille S., Gilbert B., Travers S., Bloch-Laine E., Ecollan P., Boularan J., et al. Relationship between shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index and 28-day mortality among patients with prehospital septic shock. J Emerg Med. 2024; 66: 144–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.11.010. PMID: 38336569.

27. Dewey, F. E., Rosenthal, D., Murphy, D. J., Froeliche V. F., Ashley, E. A. Does size matter? Circulation. 2008; 117: 2279–2287. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736785. PMID: 18443249.

28. Jegier W., Sekelj P., Auld P. A. M., Simpson R., McGregor M. The relation between cardiac output and body size. Heart. 1963; 25: 425–430. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.25.4.425. PMID: 14045321.

29. Infeld M., Avram R., Wahlberg K., Silverman D. N., Habel N., Lustgarten D. L., Pletcher M. J., et al. An approach towards individualized lower rate settings for pacemakers. Heart Rhythm O2. 2020; 1 (5): 390–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.09.004. PMID: 33604585.

30. Yeo H. J., Kim H. L., So M. W., Park J. M., Kim D., Cho W. H. Obesity paradox of sepsis in long-term outcome: the differential effect of body composition. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025; 87. DOI: 10.1016/j iccn.2024.103893. PMID: 39608164.

31. Lee K. J., Kim Y. K., Jeon K., Ko R. -E., Suh G. Y., Oh D. K., Lim S. Y. et al. Shock indices are associated with in-hospital mortality among patients with septic shock and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. PLoS One 2024; 19 (3): e0298617. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298617. PMID: 38470900.

32. Ngan C., Zeng X., Lia T., Yin W., Kang Y. Cardiac index and heart rate as prognostic indicators for mortality in septic shock: a retrospective cohort study from the MIMIC-IV database. Heliyon. 2024; 10 (8): e28956. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28956. PMID: 38655320.

33. Na S. J., Oh D. K., Park S., Lee Y. J., Hong S.-B., Park M. H., Ko R.-E.,. et al. The association between tachycardia and mortality in septic shock patients according to serum lactate level: a nationwide multicenter cohort study. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38 (40): e313. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e313. PMID: 37845786.

34. Mohamed A. K. S., Mehta A. A., James P. Predictors of mortality of severe sepsis among adult patients in the medical intensive care unit. Lung India. 2017; 34 (4): 330–335. DOI: 10.4103/lungindia. lungindia_54_16. PMID: 28671163.

35. Zhang K., Shi Y., Han Y., Cai T. Y., Gu F. M., Gu Z. X., Zhang T., et al. J-shaped association between respiratory rate and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients complicated by congestive heart failure in intensive care unit. Dose Response. 2024; 22 (4): 15593258241303040. DOI: 10.1177/15593258241303040. PMID: 39629219.


Review

For citations:


Andreychenko S.A., Ovcharov D.O., Yatskov K.V., Arbolishvili G.N., Rakhmanov M.A., Klypa T.V. Prognostic Index for Compensation of Reduced Heart and Lung Functions in Patients with Sepsis. General Reanimatology. 2026;22(3):4-12. https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2026-3-2698

Views: 203

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-9779 (Print)
ISSN 2411-7110 (Online)