Infectious Complications of Central Venous Catheterization
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-5-67
Abstract
The extensive introduction of invasive diagnosis and treatment methods into medical practice is inseparably linked with the necessity of catheterizing the vessels to monitor patient status and to administer medications and other agents into the vascular bed. This results in increased number of cases of catheter-related blood stream infections, which are more than 60% of hospital-acquired bacteremias and 11—37% of all nosocomial infections in Europe. The association of sepsis with an infected catheter is 20—29 to 55%. No specific clinical manifestations of catheter septicemia (and hence its late diagnosis and delayed treatment) and difficulties in identifying a venous catheter as a source of a septic process make it necessary to pay particular attention to the prevention of infectious complications both when placing a central venous catheter and when applying a venous access. Various preventive measures have been developed to reduce the incidence of infections. The measures decreasing catheter-site or infusion system colonization are most effective. Key words: puncture, catheterization, venous access, central venous catheter, colonization, infection, nosocomial infections, catheter-related blood stream infections, septicemia, catheter sepsis.
References
1. Mermel L. A., Farr B. M., Sherertz R. J. et al.
2. Frasca D., Dahyot-Fizelier C., Mimoz O.Prevention of central venous Catheter-related infection in the intensive care unit. In: Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Brussel: Springer Verlag; 2010. 223—23
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. USA: MMVR; 2002.
4. Fridkin S. K., Pear S. M., Williamson T. H. et al.The role of understuffing in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1996; 17 (3): 150—158.
5. Alonso-Echanove J, Edwards J. R., Richards M. J. et al.Effect of nurse staffing and antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters on the risk for bloodstream infections in intensive care unit. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2003; 24 (12): 916—92
6. Maki D. G., Ringer M.Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous cathethers. A randomized controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 1991; 114 (10): 845—854.
7. Ramtiru P., Halton K., Collignon P. et al.A systematic revive comparing the relative effectiveness of antimicrobial-coated catheters in intensive care units. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2008; 36 (2): 104—11
8. Kalfon P., de Vaumas C., Samba D. et al.Comparison of silver-impregnated with standard multi-lumen central venous catheters in critically ill patients. Crit. Care Med. 2007; 35 (4): 1032—1039.
9. Parienti J. J, Tirion M., Megarbane B. et al.Femoral vs jugular venous catheterization and risk of nosocomial events in adults requiring acute renal replacement therapy: а randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299 (20): 2413—2422.
10. Soifer N. E., Borzak S., Edlin B. R., Weinstein R. A.Prevention on peripheral venous catheter complications with a intravenous therapy team: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 1998; 158 (5): 473—477.
11. Raad 1.1., Honh D. C., Gilbreath B. J. et al.Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1994; 15 (4 Pt 1): 231—238.
12. Chaiyakunapruk N., Veenstra D. L., Lipsky B. A., Saint S.Chlorhexidine compared with povidone iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann. Intern Med. 2002; 136 (11): 792—801.
13. Timsit J. F., Schwebel C., Bouadma L. et al.Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less freguent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009; 301 (12): 1231 — 1241.
14. Sitges-Serra A., Linares J., Peres J. L. et al.A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub colonization and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr. 1985; 9 (3): 322—325.
15. Cook D., Randolph A., Kernerman P. et al.Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care Med. 1997; 25 (8): 1417—1424.
16. Марино П. Л.Интенсивная терапия. М.: ГЕОТАР-Медиа; 2010.
17. Ромашева М. Л., Прошин Д. Г.Диагностика сепсиса у больных в критических состояниях. Общая реаниматология 2007; III (4): 34—36.
18. Кулабухов В. В., Ларионов И. Ю., Животнева И. В.Руководство по профилактике инфекционных осложнений, связанных с внутрисо-судистым катетером. М.: Медицина; 2008.
19. McGee D. C., Gould M. K.Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 348 (12): 1123—1133.
20. Антоненков С. В.Неудачи и осложнения пункции и катетеризации подключичной вены. Дунайский мед. вестн. 2005. http://danube-care.odessa.ukrtel.net/index.php/2010-03-10-21-58-09/mainmenu-43/121—.html? start=4
21. Головченко В. Л., Романова Л. М.Использование и уход за венозными катетерами. 2008.http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Chem_Biol/Savm/2008_13/gl2/6.htm
22. Шифман Е. М.Септические осложнения в медицине критических состояний: современное состояние проблемы и перспективы. М.: Медицина; 2005.
Review
For citations:
Matveyeva E.Yu., Vlasenko A.V., Yakovlev V.N., Alekseyev V.G. Infectious Complications of Central Venous Catheterization . General Reanimatology. 2011;7(5):67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-5-67
Views:
2503
Email this article 