Preview

General Reanimatology

Advanced search

Ways of Optimizing Gas Exchange in Surgical Patients With Acute Lung Lesion and/or Respiratory Distress Syndrome

https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2006-4-60-66

Abstract

The study was undertaken to evaluate the efficiency of various medical procedures in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALL) and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in different categories of surgical patients. The study was carried out at the intensive care unit, Academician N. N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital. The findings demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed procedures that are justified in each specific case and that reduce the length of stay in an intensive care unit and total mortality. Three independent studies were conducted in 75 surgical patients diagnosed as having ALL/ARDS in accordance with the traditional criteria. The use of one or another procedure in the groups was defined as an etiological factor for a group. The findings indicate that the proposed procedures are effective, but have side effects and, accordingly, cannot be recommended as the gold standard. According to the performed study, treatment policy should be chosen on an individual basis, pathogenetically justified, in terms of effectiveness and safety.

 

About the Authors

N. A. Karpun
Academician N. N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Moscow


V. V. Moroz
Research Institute of General Reanimatology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow


A. P. Simonenko
A. V. Vishnevsky Research Institute of Surgery, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow


S. Ye. Khoroshilov
Academician N. N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Moscow


A. V. Kolesnik
Academician N. N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Moscow


Yu. V. Khrenov
Academician N. N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Moscow


References

1. Atabai K., Matthay M. A. The pulmonary physician in critical care: Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome: definitions and epidemiology. Thorax 2002; 57: 452—458.

2. Goss C. H., Brower R. G., Hudson L. D. et al. Incidence of acute lung injury in the United States. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31: 1607—1611.

3. Ware B. L., Matthay M. A. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342: 1334—1349.

4. Abel S. J. C., Finney S. J., Brett S. J. et al. Reduced mortality in association with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thorax 1998; 53: 292—294.

5. Doyle R. L., Szaflarski N., Modin G. W. et al. Identification of patients with acute lung injury: Predictors of mortality. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995; 152: 1818—1824.

6. Sloane P. J., Gee M. H., Gottlieb J. E. et al. A multicenter registry of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: Physiology and outcome. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1992; 146: 419—426.

7. Amato M. B., Barbas C. S., Medeiros D. M. et al. Beneficial effects of the «open lung approach» with low distending pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995; 152: 1835—1846.

8. The acute respiratory distress syndrome network ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342: 1301—1308.

9. Gattinoni L., Pesenti A., Torresin A. et al. Adult respiratory distress syndrome profiles by computed tomography. J. Thorac. Imaging 1986; 1: 25—30.

10. Wilkes M. M., Navickis R. F. Patients survival after human albumin administration: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Intern. Med. 2001; 135: 205—208.

11. Lamm W. J. E., Graham M. M., Albert R. K. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care 1994; 150: 184—193.

12. Dellinger R. P., Zimmerman J. L., Taylor R. W. et al. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: Results of a randomized phase II trial. Crit. Care Med. 1998; 26: 15—23.

13. Lundin S., Mang H., Smithies M. et al. Inhalation of nitric oxide in acute lung injury: Results of European multicenter study. Intens. Care Med. 1999; 25: 911—919.

14. Баутин А. Е., Оссовских В. В., Хубулава Г. Г. и др. Многоцентровые клинические испытания сурфактанта-BL для лечения респираторного дистресс-синдрома взрослых. Клинические исследования лекарственных средств в России 2002; 2: 18—23.

15. Humphrey H., Hall J., Sznajder I. et al. Improved survival in ARDS patients associated with a reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Chest 1990; 97: 1176—1180.

16. Reising C. A., Chendrasekhar A., Wall P. L. et al. Continuous dose furosemide as a therapeutic approach to acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Surg. Res. 1999; 82: 56—60.

17. Симоненков А. П., Карпун Н. А., Врублевский О. Ю. Применение серотонина адипината для улучшения оксигенирующей функциилегких у больных, находящихся на искусственной вентиляции легких. Вестн. интенс. терапии 2005; 2: 64—66.


Review

For citations:


Karpun N.A., Moroz V.V., Simonenko A.P., Khoroshilov S.Ye., Kolesnik A.V., Khrenov Yu.V. Ways of Optimizing Gas Exchange in Surgical Patients With Acute Lung Lesion and/or Respiratory Distress Syndrome. General Reanimatology. 2006;2(4):60-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2006-4-60-66

Views: 1036


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-9779 (Print)
ISSN 2411-7110 (Online)