Preview

General Reanimatology

Advanced search

The Specific Features of an Early Period after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2014-4-74-81

Abstract

Objective: to comparatively evaluate the perioperative clinical period in patients operated on via miniinvasive access and median sternotomy.

Subjects and methods. A retrospective analysis included all patients who had undergone correction of mitral valve defect with or without tricuspid valve correction and atrial ablation. 121 and 112 patients were operated on through miniinvasive access (a study group) and median sternothomy (a control group), respectively.


Results. The duration (median [25; 75 percentiles] of aortic occlusion in the study group (89 [71; 120] min) was significantly longer than that in the control group (65 [52; 84] min); р<0.01. Acute heart failure complicated the clinical course in 28 (23.1%) and 15 (13.4%) cases in the study and control groups, respectively; р=0.06. In the miniinvasive
access group, two deaths were caused by intraoperative aortic dissection. There was no significant difference in the length of stay in the intensive care unit and in that of hospitalization between the groups.

Conclusion. The findings are generally correlated with the world data obtained while implementing the procedure. The frequency and pattern of complications due to miniinvasive correction of mitral valve defect require additional financial expenditures and human resources. It is necessary to analyze the longterm results of treatment for the reasonable evaluation of the efficiency and expediency of using this procedure.

About the Authors

V. A. Shmyrev
Новосибирский научноисследовательский институт патологии кровообращения им. академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава РФ, Новосибирск
Russian Federation


D. N. Ponomarev
Новосибирский научноисследовательский институт патологии кровообращения им. академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава РФ, Новосибирск
Russian Federation


P. P. Perovsky
Новосибирский научноисследовательский институт патологии кровообращения им. академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава РФ, Новосибирск
Russian Federation


A. V. BogachevProkofyev
Новосибирский научноисследовательский институт патологии кровообращения им. академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава РФ, Новосибирск
Russian Federation


I. A. Kornilov
Новосибирский научноисследовательский институт патологии кровообращения им. академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава РФ, Новосибирск
Russian Federation


V. V. Lomivorotov
Новосибирский научноисследовательский институт патологии кровообращения им. академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава РФ, Новосибирск
Russian Federation


References

1. Cohn L.H., Adams D.H., Couper G.S., Bichell D.P., Rosborough D.M., SearsS.P., Aranki S.F. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann. Surg. 1997; 226 (4): 421—428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/0000065819971000000003. PMID: 9351710

2. Schmitto J.D., Mokashi S.A., Cohn L.H. Minimally invasive valve surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010; 56 (6): 455—462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.053. PMID: 20670754

3. Vernick W., Atluri P. Robotic and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2013; 31 (2): 299—320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2012.12.002. PMID: 23711646

4. Iribarne A., Karpenko A., Russo M.J., Cheema F.H., Umann T., Oz M.C., Smith C.R., Argenziano M. Eightyear experience with minimallyinva sive cardiothoracic surgery. World J. Surg. 2010; 34 (4): 611—615. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s0026800902607. PMID: 19838752

5. Bogachev Prokofyev A.V., Zheleznev S.I., Teleutaev R.M., Afanasyev A.V., Arkhipov A.N., Boboshko V.A., Nazarov V.M., Karaskov A.M. Lechenie SAMsindroma pri rekonstruktsii mitralnogo klapana s ispolzovaniem robotizirovannoi sistemy DA VINCI. [Treatment of SAM syndrome during mitral valve repair using the robotic DA VINCI system]. Kardiologiya i Serdechno Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2013; 6 (1): 85—87. [In Russ.]

6. Lomivorotov V.V., Shmyrev V.A., Efremov S.M., Ponomarev D.N., Moroz G.B., Shakhin D.G., Kornilov I.A., Shilova A.N., Lomivorotov V.N., Zheleznev S.I. Normotermichesky ili gipotermichesky rezhimy iskusstvennogo krovoobrashcheniya u patsientov s priobretennymi porokami serdtsa. Obshchaya Reanimatologiya. [Normothermal or hypothermal extracorpo real circulation regimens in patients with acquired heart disease. General Reanimatology]. 2013; 9 (4): 42—49. [In Russ.]

7. Nikiforov Yu.V., Krichevsky L.A. Patofiziologiya serdtsa i klinicheskaya kardioanesteziologiya. Obshchaya Reanimatologiya. [Pathophysiology of the heart and clinical cardiac anesthesiology. General Reanimatology]. 2012; 8 (4): 123—125. [In Russ.]

8. Krichevsky L.A., Rybakov V.Yu., Guseva O.G., Lyamin A.Yu.,Kharlamova I.E., Magilevets A.I. Rannyaya diagnostika kriticheskikh postperfuzionnykh rasstroistv krovoobrashcheniya. Obshchaya Reanimatologiya. [Early diagnosis of critical postperfusion circulatory disorders. General Reanimatology]. 2012; 8 (3): 25—30. [In Russ.]

9. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3900051070. URL http://www.Rproject.org/.

10. Navia J.L., Cosgrove D.M. Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996; 62 (5): 1542—1544. PMID: 8893611

11. Modi P., Hassan A., Chitwood W.R.Jr. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008; 34 (5): 943—952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejcts.2008.07.057. PMID: 18829343

12. Zheleznev S.I., Bogachev Prokofyev A.V., Pivkin A.N., Nazarov V.M., Emeshkin M.I., Karaskov A.M. Sravnenie rezultatov konkomitantnoi protsedury Maze III i radiochastotnoi ablatsii predserdii u patsientov s klapannymi porokami serdtsa. [Comparing the results of a concomitant procedure of Maze III and atrial radiofrequency ablation in patients with valvular heart diseases]. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya i Kardiokhirurgiya. 2012;4: 9—14. [In Russ.]

13. de Vaumas C., Philip I., Daccache G., Depoix J.P., Lecharny J.B., Enguerand D., Desmonts J.M. Comparison of minithoracotomy and conventional sternotomy approaches for valve surgery. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2003; 17 (3): 325—328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S10530770(03)00051X. PMID: 12827580

14. Krichevsky L.A., Semenychev N.V., Magilevets A.I., Rybakov V.Yu., Lapty A.V., Kharlamova I.E., Setyn T.V. Anesteziologicheskoe obespechenie miniinvazivnykh operatsii na klapanakh serdtsa. Obshchaya Reanimatologiya. [Anesthesia maintenance during miniinvasive cardiac valve surgery. General Reanimatology]. 2013; 9 (3): 48—53. [In Russ.]

15. Seeburger J., Borger M.A., Falk V., Kuntze T., Czesla M., Walther T., Doll N., Mohr F. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgita tion: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008; 34 (4): 760—765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.015. PMID: 18586512

16. Iribarne A., Easterwood R., Russo M.J., Chan E.Y., Smith C.R., Argenziano M. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012; 143 (Suppl 4): S86—S90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.090. PMID: 22423605

17. Grossi E.A., LaPietra A., Ribakove G.H., Delianides J., Esposito R., Culliford A.T., Derivaux C.C., Applebaum R.M., Kronzon I., Steinberg B.M., Baumann F.G., Galloway A.C., Colvin S.B. Minimally invasive versus ster notomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermedi ateterm results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001; 121 (4): 708—713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.112626. PMID: 11279412

18. Mohr F.W., Falk V., Diegeler A., Walther T., van Son J.A., Autschbach R. Minimally invasive portaccess mitral valve surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998; 115 (3): 567—574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S00225223(98)703204. PMID: 9535444

19. Hamano K., Kawamura T., Gohra H., Katoh T., Fujimura Y., Zempo N., Miyamoto M., Tsuboi H., Tanimoto Y., Esato K. Stress caused by minimally invasive cardiac surgery versus conventional cardiac surgery: incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. World J. Surg. 2001; 25 (2): 117—121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002680020048. PMID: 11338008

20. Grossi E.A., Loulmet D.F., Schwartz C.F., Ursomanno P., Zias E.A., Dellis S.L., Galloway A.C. Evolution of operative techniques and perfusion strategies for minimally invasive mitral valve repair. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012; 143 (Suppl 4): S68—S70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.011. PMID: 22285326


Review

For citations:


Shmyrev V.A., Ponomarev D.N., Perovsky P.P., BogachevProkofyev A.V., Kornilov I.A., Lomivorotov V.V. The Specific Features of an Early Period after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. General Reanimatology. 2014;10(4):74-81. https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2014-4-74-81

Views: 1214


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-9779 (Print)
ISSN 2411-7110 (Online)