Epidemiology of Sepsis in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of a Multi-Specialty Hospital (Experimental Study)
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2019-4-42-57
Abstract
Purpose of the study: to investigate the epidemiology of sepsis in patients with different locations of the infection focus, who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a multi-specialty hospital in 2014 and 2016.
Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of examination and treatment of 860 patients admitted to ICU of a multi-specialty hospital with the diagnosis ‘sepsis’ in 2014 and 2016 was carried out. Sepsis was diagnosed pursuant to the Sepsis-2 Guidelines and verified by blood procalcitonin test. The gender, age, main diagnosis, patient’s severity at the time of admission to ICU, duration in ICU, and peculiarities of intensive care and outcomes were studied.
Results. Sepsis was diagnosed at admission in 2014 in 361 (8.6%) patients out of 4175 patients, in 2016 — in 499 (10.5%) out of 4726 patients who were admitted to ICU and had infection foci of different location. Abdominal sepsis was diagnosed in 72.3% of patients, pulmonary — in 19.7%; in 8% of patients, sepsis complicated the terminal stage of various, mostly oncological, diseases. In 2016, sepsis detectability at admission to ICU increased by 22.1% vs. the 2014 level assumed as 100% (χ2=9.281; P=0.003). In case of the abdominal sepsis, mortality amounted to 50.3% and was not different from mortality in pulmonary sepsis — 52.1% (χ2=0,163; P=0.687). The ICU in-patient duration in case of pulmonary sepsis was considerably longer than in case of abdominal. The age was a predictor of mortality in case of abdominal sepsis (the age older than 65 years predicted the risk of lethal outcome with sensitivity equal to 58.8% and specificity equal to 59.9%), which was not true for pulmonary sepsis. The mortality prognosis during abdominal sepsis was improved by combined analysis of the SOFA score and patient’s age at admission: AUROC of the combined index was equal to 0.816 (95%-confidence interval: 0.783–0.846). Depending on the infection focus location, specificity of influence rendered on mortality by different clinical indices and management methods was determined.
Conclusion. Patients admitted to ICU with sepsis represent a group of a high mortality risk amounting to 50% approximately. During chronological analysis, sepsis detectability increases but mortality does not change. Patients with pulmonary sepsis at admission to ICU are characterized by a greater severity of condition due to multiple organ failure than in case of abdominal sepsis; in such patients it is impossible to predict the risk of mortality based on APACHE II and SOFA score. Taking into account heterogeneity of the sepsis patient population, deepening of the knowledge about peculiarities of pathogenesis and clinical pattern of abdominal and pulmonary sepsis is the basic requirement for improvement of the results of treatment of this complication.
About the Authors
I. N. TyurinRussian Federation
Igor N. Tyurin
26 Bakinskya Str., 115516 Moscow,
1 Ostrovityanov Str., 117997 Moscow
S. N. Avdeikin
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Avdeikin
26 Bakinskya Str., 115516 Moscow
D. N. Protsenko
Russian Federation
Denis N. Protsenko
1 Ostrovityanov Str., 117997 Moscow
R. A. Cherpakov
Russian Federation
Rostislav A. Cherpakov
26 Bakinskya Str., 115516 Moscow
G. M. Mullakaeva
Russian Federation
Gulnaz M. Mullakaeva
1 Ostrovityanov Str., 117997 Moscow
I. A. Kozlov
Russian Federation
Igor A. Kozlov
26 Bakinskya Str., 115516 Moscow,
61/2 Shchepkin Str., 129110 Moscow
References
1. Laszlo I., Trasy D., Molnar Z., Fazakas J. Sepsis: From Pathophysiology to Individualized Patient Care. J Immunol Res. 2015; 2015: 510436. DOI: 10.1155/2015/510436.
2. Lipinska-Gediga M. Sepsis and septic shock – is a microcirculation a main player? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016; 48 (4): 261-265. DOI: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0037.
3. Beloborodova N.V., Kuzovlev A.N. On the VIII Congress of the International Federation of Shock Studies. Obshchaya reanimatologiya=General Reanimatology. 2017; 13 (1): 73-74. [In Russ., In Engl.] DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2017-1.
4. Beloborodova N.B., Ostrova I.V. Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy (Review). Obshchaya reanimatologiya=General Reanimatology. 2017; 13 (5): 121-139. [In Russ., In Engl.] DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2017-5121-139
5. Genga K.R., Russell J.A. Update of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit. J Innate Immun. 2017; 9 (5): 441-455. DOI: 10.1159/000477419.
6. Hernandez G., Ospina-Tascon G.A., Damiani L.P., Estenssoro E., Dubin A., Hurtado J., Friedman G., Castro R., Alegrнa L., Teboul J.-L., Cecconi M., Ferri G., Jibaja M., Pairumani R., Fernandez P., Barahona D., Granda-Luna V., Cavalcanti A.B., Bakker J., ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Investigators and the Latin America Intensive Care Network (LIVEN). Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock. The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019; 321 (7): 654-664. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.0071
7. Khoroshilov S.E., Nikulin A.V. Detoxication in Critical Conditions: an Insight into the Scientific Problem in the XXI Century (Review). Obshchaya reanimatologiya=General Reanimatology. 2017; 13 (5): 85108. [In Russ.] DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2017-5-85-108 [In Engl.]
8. Zhang Z., Zhang G., Goyal H., Mo L., Hong Y. Identification of subclasses of sepsis that showed different clinical outcomes and responses to amount of fluid resuscitation: a latent profile analysis. Crit Care. 2018; 22 (1): 347. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-2279-3.
9. Sakr Y., Jaschinski U., Wittebole X., Szakmany T., Lipman J., NamendysSilva S.A., Martin-Loeches I., Leone M., Lupu M.N., Vincent J.L.; ICON Investigators. Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data From the Intensive Care over Nations Audit. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018; 5 (12): ofy313. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy313.
10. Fleischmann C., Scherag A., Adhikari N.K., Hartog C.S., Tsaganos T., Schlattmann P., Angus D.C., Reinhart K.; International Forum of Acute Care Trialists. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospitaltreated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193 (3): 259-72. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2015040781OC.
11. Padkin A., Goldfrad C., Brady A.R., Young D., Black N., Rowan K. Epidemiology of severe sepsis occurring in the first 24 hrs in intensive care units in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31 (9): 2332-2338. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000085141.75513.2B
12. Kashyap R., Singh T.D., Rayes H., O’Horo J.C., Wilson G., Bauer P., Gajic O. Association of septic shock definitions and standardized mortality ratio in contemporary cohort of critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2019; 50: 269-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.005.
13. Rhee C., Jones T.M., Hamad Y., Pande A., Varon J., O’Brien C., Anderson D.J., Warren D.K., Dantes R.B., Epstein L., Klompas M.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevention Epicenters Program. Prevalence, Underlying Causes, and Preventability of Sepsis-Associated Mortality in US Acute Care Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2 (2): e187571. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7571.
14. Shankar-Hari M., Harrison D.A., Rubenfeld G.D., Rowan K. Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in critical care units: comparison between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations using a national critical care database. Br J Anaesth. 2017; 119 (4): 626-636. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex234.
15. Rudnov V.A., Kulabukhov V.V. Sepsis-3: updated main definitions, potential problems and next practical steps. Vestnik anesteziologii i reanimatologii 2016; 13 (4): 4–11.[In Russ.] DOI: 10.21292/2078-56582016-13-4-4-11
16. Rudnov V.A., Belskij D.V., Dekhnich A.V., RIORITA research group. Infections in the ICU of Russia: the results of a national multicenter study. Klin. mikrobiol. antimikrob. khimioter.2011; 13 (4): 294-303.[In Russ.]
17. Astafeva M.N., Rudnov V.A., Kulabuhov V.V., Bagin V.A., Zubareva N.A., Tribulyov M.A., Muhacheva S.Yu., RISES Research Group. Use of the qSOFA score in the diagnosis of sepsis. Results of the Russian multicenter RISES study. Vestnik Anesteziol. Reanimatol. 2018; 15 (4): 1422. [In Russ.] DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-4-14-22
18. Plotkin L.L. Epidemiology of abdominal sepsis . Vestnik khir., 2006; 165 (4): 23-26. [In Russ.]
19. Dellinger R.P., Levy M.M., Rhodes A., Annane D., Gerlach H., Opal S.M., Sevransky J.E., Sprung C.L., Douglas I.S., Jaeschke R., Osborn T.M., Nunnally M.E., Townsend S.R., Reinhart K., Kleinpell R.M., Angus D.C., Deutschman C.S., Machado F.R., Rubenfeld G.D., Webb S., Beale R.J., Vincent J.L., Moreno R.; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39 (2): 165-228. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8.
20. Sprung C.L., Sakr Y., Vincent J.L., Le Gall J.R., Reinhart K., Ranieri V.M., Gerlach H., Fielden J., Groba C.B., Payen D. An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence In Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) study. Intensive Care Med., 2006, 32 (3): 421-427. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8
21. Vincent J.L., Rello J., Marshall J., Silva E., Anzueto A., Martin C.D., Moreno R., Lipman J., Gomersall C., Sakr Y., Reinhart K.; EPIC II Group of Investigators. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA. 2009; 302 (21): 2323-2329. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1754.
22. Angus D.C. How Best to Resuscitate Patients With Septic Shock? JAMA, 2019, 321 (7): 647-648. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.0070.
23. Avdejkin S.N., Tyurin I.N., Kozlov I.A. Correction of hemodynamics in severe community-acquired pneumonia, complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome. Meditsinskiy alfavit. 2018; 18 (2). Neotlojnaya meditsina: 19-26.[In Russ.]
24. Avdejkin S.N., Tyurin I.N., Salikov A.V., Karpun N.A., Kozlov I.A. Early predictors of mortality in severe community-acquired pneumonia. Meditsinskiy alfavit. 2015; 20 (4). Neotlojnaya meditsina: 29-35. [In Russ.]
25. Kozlov I.A., Tyurin I.N., Rautbart S.A. Early predictors of mortality in abdominal sepsis . Vestnik anesteziologii i reanimatologii, 2018, 15 (2): 6-15. [In Russ.] DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-2-6-15
26. Starr M. E., Saito H. Sepsis in old age: review of human and animal studies. Aging and Disease. 2014; 5 (2): 126-136. DOI: 10.14336/AD.2014.0500126.
27. Mohr N.M., Dick-Perez R., Ahmed A., Harland K.K., Shane D., Miller D., Miyake C., Kannedy L., Fuller B.M., Torner J.C. Emergency department charges may be associated with mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a cohort study. BMC Emerg Med. 2018; 18 (1): 62. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-018-0212-3.
28. Guerin C., Matthay M A. Acute cor pulmonale and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42 (5): 934-936. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-4197-z.
29. Namendys-Silva S.A., Santos-Martinez L.E., Pulido T., Rivero-Sigarroa E., Baltazar-Torres J.A., Dominguez-Cherit G., Sandoval J. Pulmonary hypertension due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014; 47 (10): 904-910. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20143316
30. Violi F., Cangemi R., Falcone M., Taliani G., Pieralli F., Vannucchi V., Nozzoli C., Venditti M., Chirinos J.A., Corrales-Medina V.F.; SIXTUS (Thrombosis-Related Extrapulmonary Outcomes in Pneumonia) Study Group. Cardiovascular Complications and Short-term Mortality Risk in Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 64 (11): 1486-1493. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix164.
31. Vincent J.L., Opal S.M., Marshall J.C., Tracey K.J. Sepsis definitions: time for change. Lancet, 2013; 381 (9868): 774-775. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61815-7.
32. Biskup E., Cai F., Vetter M., Marsch S. Oncological patients in the intensive care unit: prognosis, decision-making, therapies and end-oflife care. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017; 147: w14481. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2017.14481.
33. Kostakou E., Rovina N., Kyriakopoulou M., Koulouris N.G., Koutsoukou A. Critically ill cancer patient in intensive care unit: issues that arise. J Crit Care. 2014; 29 (5): 817-822. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.007
34. Schultz M.J., Dunser M.W., Dondorp A.M., Adhikari N.K., Iyer S., Kwizera A., Lubell Y., Papali A., Pisani L., Riviello B.D., Angus D.C., Azevedo L.C., Baker T., Diaz J.V., Festic E., Haniffa R., Jawa R., Jacob S.T., Kissoon N., Lodha R., Martin-Loeches I., Lundeg G., Misango D., Mer M., Mohanty S., Murthy S., Musa N., Nakibuuka J., Serpa Neto A., Nguyen Thi Hoang M., Nguyen Thien B., Pattnaik R., Phua J., Preller J., Povoa P., Ranjit S., Talmor D., Thevanayagam J., Thwaites C.L.; Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resourcepoor settings and for the future. Intensive Care Med., 2017; 43 (5): 612-624. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4750-z.
Review
For citations:
Tyurin I.N., Avdeikin S.N., Protsenko D.N., Cherpakov R.A., Mullakaeva G.M., Kozlov I.A. Epidemiology of Sepsis in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of a Multi-Specialty Hospital (Experimental Study). General Reanimatology. 2019;15(4):42-57. https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2019-4-42-57