Preview

General Reanimatology

Advanced search

Comparative Assessment of Equivalence of the Post-Operative Use of Two Amino Acid Solutions

https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2026-2-2687

Abstract

Objective: to compare the nutritional and metabolic effects of two amino acids-containing solutions, differed in amino acid profiles and sorbitol presence, when employed as a part of standardized combined post-operative nutritional support in patients undergoing surgery for abdominal cancer.

Materials and Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted in two specialized hospitals. The study included 120 nutritionally stable patients aged 18–80 with stage I–III colorectal tumors and ASA class II–III anesthetic risk (mean BMI 25.3–27.6 kg/m²), who underwent elective abdominal surgeries and required parenteral administration of protein-carbohydrate nutrition solution (PCNS) for at least 5 days. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups for receiving PCNS formulations Amiparcenin or Aminoven formulated at 10-percent concentration (60 patients, each group). Both regimens involved administering an amino acid solution at 10 ml/kg/day in combination with a 10% dextrose solution at 10 ml/kg/day, alongside with early enteral feeding. The amino acid and nutritional profiles were assessed before initiation of nutritional support (T0), on the 2nd (T1), and 5th (T2) postoperative days. Key indicators included the sum of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA_sum), the sum of aromatic amino acids (AAA_sum), the ratio of BCAA/AAA, the integral indicator of amino acids in the urea cycle (UreaCycle_sum), and index ratios of ornithine to citrulline, arginine to ornithine, and arginine to citrulline. Additionally, total protein, albumin, nitrogen balance, bioimpedance indicator of active cellular mass (BIA ACM), creatinine, liver function markers, and electrolyte profiles were analyzed. To evaluate clinical equivalence, a two one-sided tests (TOST) analysis was employed with pre-defined limits of clinically acceptable difference (∆) for each parameter.

Results. By day 5, both groups showed statistically significant changes in total protein and albumin levels, reflecting the transition from the early catabolic phase and the impact of nutritional support; no intergroup differences were observed for these parameters, and the TOST analysis confirmed their equivalence within the predefined limits of ∆. The branched-chain amino acids (BCAA_sum) level increased from T0 to T1 and then stabilized at T2 in both groups; the factors «group» and the «group×period» interaction were not significant (p = 0.285 and p = 0.362, respectively), however, the equivalence of absolute BCAA_sum values at T2 with a narrow ∆ = 10 µmol/L was not confirmed (p-TOST> 0.05). For AAA_sum, differences were documented based on the «group» factor (p = 0.035) and the interaction «period×group» (p = 0.0099), with alignment of absolute values at T2. The ratio of BCAA/AAA and the index indicators of the urea cycle (Orn/Cit, Arg/Orn, Arg/Cit) remained stable, with no intergroup differences, and met the equivalence criteria throughout all observation periods. According to bio-impedance analysis, the Amiparcenin group showed a more significant increase in active cell mass (p by Friedman = 0.00001; intergroup p at T1 = 0.0048, at T2 = 0.00014), while the Aminoven group did not show significant dynamics; moreover, the TOST analysis with a wide ∆ showed formal equivalence in BIA ACM. Creatinine, urea, transaminases, and electrolyte levels remained comparable between the groups and were within clinically acceptable ranges; equivalence for these parameters was confirmed.

Conclusion. In the early postoperative period, Amiparcenin and Aminoven 10% solutions provide comparable amino acid and nutritional supply, and biochemical effects as a part of standardized combined nutritional support in patients with abdominal cancers. The studied regimens met equivalence criteria for most essential amino acid indicators (including BCAA/AAA), markers of inflammation, protein metabolism, liver and kidney function, and electrolyte balance. The differences found in absolute values of BCAA_sum, AAA_sum, UreaCycle_sum, and malondialdehyde (MDA) do not translate into clinically significant shifts during the first 5 days post-surgery.

About the Authors

I. S. Simutis
Sokolov Northwestern District Research and Clinical Center, Federal Medico-Biological Agency of Russia; I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Ionas S. Simutis

4 Ave. Culture, 194291 Saint Petersburg; 
47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg



А. Yu. Yakovlev
N. A. Semashko Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Аlexey Yu. Yakovlev

190 Rodionova Str., 603126 Nizhny Novgorod



Yu. V. Levadnev
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Rauchfuss Children's City Multidisciplinary Clinical Center for High Medical Technologies
Russian Federation

Yurij V. Levadnev

47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg; 
8 Ligovsky Ave., 190961 St. Petersburg



M. A. Saveleva
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Maria A. Saveleva 

47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg



K. S. Blitsõn
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Kristina S. Blitsõn

47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg



R. S. Perefilev
N. A. Semashko Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Roman S. Perefilev

190 Rodionova Str., 603126 Nizhny Novgorod



A. Yu. Smorkalov
N. A. Semashko Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Andrey Yu. Smorkalov

190 Rodionova Str., 603126 Nizhny Novgorod



References

1. Arends J., Bachmann P., Baracos V., Barthelemy N., Bertz H., Bozzetti F., Fearon K., et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (1): 11–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015. PMID: 27637832.

2. Arends J., Strasser F., Gonella S., Solheim T.S., Madeddu C., Ravasco P., Buonaccorso L., et al. Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. ESMO Open. 2021; 6 (3): 100092. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100092. PMID: 34144781.

3. Cederholm T., Barazzoni R., Austin P., Ballmer P., Biolo G., Bischoff S.C., Compher C., et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (1): 49–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004. PMID: 27642056.

4. Burden S.T., Todd C., Hill J., Lai S. Perioperative nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11: CD008879. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008879.pub2. PMID: 23152265.

5. Weimann A., Braga M., Carli F., Higashiguchi T., Hübner M., Klek S., Laviano A., et al. ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (3): 623–650. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013.

6. Arends J., Baracos V., Bertz H., Bozzetti F., Calder P.C., Deutz N.E.P., Erickson N., et al. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (5): 1187–1196. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. PMID: 28689670.

7. Singer P., Blaser A.R., Berger M.M.. Alhazzani W., Calder P.C., Casaer M.P., Hiesmayr M., et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019; 38(1): 48–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. PMID: 30348463.

8. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Perioperative nutritional support for adult patients: clinical guidelines. Moscow; 2021. (in Russ.).

9. Leiderman I.N., Gritsan A.I., Zabolotskikh I.B., Mazurok V.A., Polyakov I.V., Potapov A.L., Sytov A.V., et al. Perioperative nutritional support. Clinical practice recommendations of the national «Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists». Ann Crit Care =Vestnik Intensivnoy Terapii im A.I. Saltanova. 2021; 4: 7–20. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-4-7-20.

10. Bozzetti F., Forbes A. The ESPEN clinical practice guidelines on parenteral nutrition: present status and perspectives for future research. Clin Nutr. 2009; 28(4): 359–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.010. PMID: 1952372.

11. Braga M., Ljungqvist O., Soeters P., Fearon K., Weimann A., Bozzetti F., EPSEN. ESPEN Guidelines on parenteral nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr. 2009; 28 (4): 378–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.002. PMID: 19464088.

12. Struijs M.-Ch., Schaible T., van Elburg R.M., Debauche C., te Beest H., Tibboel D. Efficacy and safety of a parenteral amino acid solution containing alanyl-glutamine versus standard solution in infants: a first-in-man randomized double-blind trial. Clin Nutr. 2013; 32 (3): 331–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.09.001. PMID: 23562219.

13. Adamkin D.H., McClead R.E. Jr., Desai N.S., McCulloch K.M., Marchildon M.B. Comparison of two neonatal intravenous amino acid formulations in preterm infants: a multicenter study. J Perinatol. 1991; 11 (4): 375–382. PMID: 1770397.

14. Holeček M. Branched-chain amino acids in health and disease: metabolism, alterations in blood plasma, and as supplements. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2018; 15: 33. DOI: 10.1186/s12986-018-0271-1. PMID: 29755574.

15. Plauth M., Bernal W., Dasarathy S., Merli M., Plank L.D., Schütz T., Bischoff S.C. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in liver disease. Clin Nutr. 2019; 38 (2): 485–521. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.022. PMID: 30712783.

16. Sun L.-C., Shih Y.-L., Lu C.-Y.. Hsieh J.-S., Chuang J.-F., Chen F.-M., Ma C.-J., et al. Randomized, controlled study of branched chain amino acid-enriched total parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery. Am Surg. 2008; 74 (3): 237–242. PMID: 1837669.

17. Arvanitakis M., Ockenga J., Bezmarevic M., Gianotti L., Krznarić Ž., Lobo D.N., Löser C., et al. ESPEN practical guideline on clinical nutrition in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Clin Nutr. 2024; 43 (2): 395–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.12.019. PMID: 38169174.

18. Hoffer L.J. Parenteral nutrition: amino acids. Nutrients. 2017; 9 (3): 257. DOI: 10.3390/nu9030257. PMID: 28287411.

19. Hall J.W. Safety, cost, and clinical considerations for the use of premixed parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 30 (3): 325–330. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615578459. PMID: 25862011.

20. Tan G.H.C., Chia C.S., Wong J.S.M., Ong W.S., Zhu H.-Y., Ong C.-A.J., Teo M.C.C. Randomized controlled trial investigating perioperative iimmunonutrition for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 30: 777–789. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12509-w. PMID: 36180619.

21. Yu H.M., Tang C.W., Feng W.M., Chen Q.Q., Xu Y.Q., Bao Y. Early enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition after resection of esophageal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Indian J Surg. 2017; 79 (1): 13–18. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1420-7. PMID: 28331260.

22. Ionescu V.A., Gheorghe G., Oprita R., Stanllie M., Dascalu R.-I., Zaharia O., Jinga V., et al. The outcomes of nutritional support techniques in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Gastroenterol Insights. 2022; 13 (3): 245–257. DOI: 10.3390/gastroent13030025.

23. Matthews L., Bates A., Wootton S.A., Levett D. The use of bioelectrical impedance analysis to predict post-operative complications in adult patients having surgery for cancer: a systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2021; 40 (5): 2914–2922. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.008. PMID: 33962360.

24. Lee G.H., Gho H.J., Lee G., Kim H.G., Wang H.J., Kim B.-W., Lee M.Y., et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis for predicting postoperative complications and survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9 (3): 190. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-5194. PMID: 33708817.


Review

For citations:


Simutis I.S., Yakovlev А.Yu., Levadnev Yu.V., Saveleva M.A., Blitsõn K.S., Perefilev R.S., Smorkalov A.Yu. Comparative Assessment of Equivalence of the Post-Operative Use of Two Amino Acid Solutions. General Reanimatology. 2026;22(2):15-28. https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2026-2-2687

Views: 418

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-9779 (Print)
ISSN 2411-7110 (Online)