Comparative Assessment of Equivalence of the Post-Operative Use of Two Amino Acid Solutions
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2026-2-2687
Abstract
Objective: to compare the nutritional and metabolic effects of two amino acids-containing solutions, differed in amino acid profiles and sorbitol presence, when employed as a part of standardized combined post-operative nutritional support in patients undergoing surgery for abdominal cancer.
Materials and Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted in two specialized hospitals. The study included 120 nutritionally stable patients aged 18–80 with stage I–III colorectal tumors and ASA class II–III anesthetic risk (mean BMI 25.3–27.6 kg/m²), who underwent elective abdominal surgeries and required parenteral administration of protein-carbohydrate nutrition solution (PCNS) for at least 5 days. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups for receiving PCNS formulations Amiparcenin or Aminoven formulated at 10-percent concentration (60 patients, each group). Both regimens involved administering an amino acid solution at 10 ml/kg/day in combination with a 10% dextrose solution at 10 ml/kg/day, alongside with early enteral feeding. The amino acid and nutritional profiles were assessed before initiation of nutritional support (T0), on the 2nd (T1), and 5th (T2) postoperative days. Key indicators included the sum of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA_sum), the sum of aromatic amino acids (AAA_sum), the ratio of BCAA/AAA, the integral indicator of amino acids in the urea cycle (UreaCycle_sum), and index ratios of ornithine to citrulline, arginine to ornithine, and arginine to citrulline. Additionally, total protein, albumin, nitrogen balance, bioimpedance indicator of active cellular mass (BIA ACM), creatinine, liver function markers, and electrolyte profiles were analyzed. To evaluate clinical equivalence, a two one-sided tests (TOST) analysis was employed with pre-defined limits of clinically acceptable difference (∆) for each parameter.
Results. By day 5, both groups showed statistically significant changes in total protein and albumin levels, reflecting the transition from the early catabolic phase and the impact of nutritional support; no intergroup differences were observed for these parameters, and the TOST analysis confirmed their equivalence within the predefined limits of ∆. The branched-chain amino acids (BCAA_sum) level increased from T0 to T1 and then stabilized at T2 in both groups; the factors «group» and the «group×period» interaction were not significant (p = 0.285 and p = 0.362, respectively), however, the equivalence of absolute BCAA_sum values at T2 with a narrow ∆ = 10 µmol/L was not confirmed (p-TOST> 0.05). For AAA_sum, differences were documented based on the «group» factor (p = 0.035) and the interaction «period×group» (p = 0.0099), with alignment of absolute values at T2. The ratio of BCAA/AAA and the index indicators of the urea cycle (Orn/Cit, Arg/Orn, Arg/Cit) remained stable, with no intergroup differences, and met the equivalence criteria throughout all observation periods. According to bio-impedance analysis, the Amiparcenin group showed a more significant increase in active cell mass (p by Friedman = 0.00001; intergroup p at T1 = 0.0048, at T2 = 0.00014), while the Aminoven group did not show significant dynamics; moreover, the TOST analysis with a wide ∆ showed formal equivalence in BIA ACM. Creatinine, urea, transaminases, and electrolyte levels remained comparable between the groups and were within clinically acceptable ranges; equivalence for these parameters was confirmed.
Conclusion. In the early postoperative period, Amiparcenin and Aminoven 10% solutions provide comparable amino acid and nutritional supply, and biochemical effects as a part of standardized combined nutritional support in patients with abdominal cancers. The studied regimens met equivalence criteria for most essential amino acid indicators (including BCAA/AAA), markers of inflammation, protein metabolism, liver and kidney function, and electrolyte balance. The differences found in absolute values of BCAA_sum, AAA_sum, UreaCycle_sum, and malondialdehyde (MDA) do not translate into clinically significant shifts during the first 5 days post-surgery.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. S. SimutisRussian Federation
Ionas S. Simutis
4 Ave. Culture, 194291 Saint Petersburg;
47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg
А. Yu. Yakovlev
Russian Federation
Аlexey Yu. Yakovlev
190 Rodionova Str., 603126 Nizhny Novgorod
Yu. V. Levadnev
Russian Federation
Yurij V. Levadnev
47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg;
8 Ligovsky Ave., 190961 St. Petersburg
M. A. Saveleva
Russian Federation
Maria A. Saveleva
47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg
K. S. Blitsõn
Russian Federation
Kristina S. Blitsõn
47 Piskarevskii prospect, 195067 St. Petersburg
R. S. Perefilev
Russian Federation
Roman S. Perefilev
190 Rodionova Str., 603126 Nizhny Novgorod
A. Yu. Smorkalov
Russian Federation
Andrey Yu. Smorkalov
190 Rodionova Str., 603126 Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Arends J., Bachmann P., Baracos V., Barthelemy N., Bertz H., Bozzetti F., Fearon K., et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (1): 11–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015. PMID: 27637832.
2. Arends J., Strasser F., Gonella S., Solheim T.S., Madeddu C., Ravasco P., Buonaccorso L., et al. Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. ESMO Open. 2021; 6 (3): 100092. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100092. PMID: 34144781.
3. Cederholm T., Barazzoni R., Austin P., Ballmer P., Biolo G., Bischoff S.C., Compher C., et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (1): 49–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004. PMID: 27642056.
4. Burden S.T., Todd C., Hill J., Lai S. Perioperative nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11: CD008879. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008879.pub2. PMID: 23152265.
5. Weimann A., Braga M., Carli F., Higashiguchi T., Hübner M., Klek S., Laviano A., et al. ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (3): 623–650. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013.
6. Arends J., Baracos V., Bertz H., Bozzetti F., Calder P.C., Deutz N.E.P., Erickson N., et al. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36 (5): 1187–1196. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. PMID: 28689670.
7. Singer P., Blaser A.R., Berger M.M.. Alhazzani W., Calder P.C., Casaer M.P., Hiesmayr M., et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019; 38(1): 48–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. PMID: 30348463.
8. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Perioperative nutritional support for adult patients: clinical guidelines. Moscow; 2021. (in Russ.).
9. Leiderman I.N., Gritsan A.I., Zabolotskikh I.B., Mazurok V.A., Polyakov I.V., Potapov A.L., Sytov A.V., et al. Perioperative nutritional support. Clinical practice recommendations of the national «Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists». Ann Crit Care =Vestnik Intensivnoy Terapii im A.I. Saltanova. 2021; 4: 7–20. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-4-7-20.
10. Bozzetti F., Forbes A. The ESPEN clinical practice guidelines on parenteral nutrition: present status and perspectives for future research. Clin Nutr. 2009; 28(4): 359–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.010. PMID: 1952372.
11. Braga M., Ljungqvist O., Soeters P., Fearon K., Weimann A., Bozzetti F., EPSEN. ESPEN Guidelines on parenteral nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr. 2009; 28 (4): 378–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.002. PMID: 19464088.
12. Struijs M.-Ch., Schaible T., van Elburg R.M., Debauche C., te Beest H., Tibboel D. Efficacy and safety of a parenteral amino acid solution containing alanyl-glutamine versus standard solution in infants: a first-in-man randomized double-blind trial. Clin Nutr. 2013; 32 (3): 331–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.09.001. PMID: 23562219.
13. Adamkin D.H., McClead R.E. Jr., Desai N.S., McCulloch K.M., Marchildon M.B. Comparison of two neonatal intravenous amino acid formulations in preterm infants: a multicenter study. J Perinatol. 1991; 11 (4): 375–382. PMID: 1770397.
14. Holeček M. Branched-chain amino acids in health and disease: metabolism, alterations in blood plasma, and as supplements. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2018; 15: 33. DOI: 10.1186/s12986-018-0271-1. PMID: 29755574.
15. Plauth M., Bernal W., Dasarathy S., Merli M., Plank L.D., Schütz T., Bischoff S.C. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in liver disease. Clin Nutr. 2019; 38 (2): 485–521. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.022. PMID: 30712783.
16. Sun L.-C., Shih Y.-L., Lu C.-Y.. Hsieh J.-S., Chuang J.-F., Chen F.-M., Ma C.-J., et al. Randomized, controlled study of branched chain amino acid-enriched total parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery. Am Surg. 2008; 74 (3): 237–242. PMID: 1837669.
17. Arvanitakis M., Ockenga J., Bezmarevic M., Gianotti L., Krznarić Ž., Lobo D.N., Löser C., et al. ESPEN practical guideline on clinical nutrition in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Clin Nutr. 2024; 43 (2): 395–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.12.019. PMID: 38169174.
18. Hoffer L.J. Parenteral nutrition: amino acids. Nutrients. 2017; 9 (3): 257. DOI: 10.3390/nu9030257. PMID: 28287411.
19. Hall J.W. Safety, cost, and clinical considerations for the use of premixed parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 30 (3): 325–330. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615578459. PMID: 25862011.
20. Tan G.H.C., Chia C.S., Wong J.S.M., Ong W.S., Zhu H.-Y., Ong C.-A.J., Teo M.C.C. Randomized controlled trial investigating perioperative iimmunonutrition for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 30: 777–789. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12509-w. PMID: 36180619.
21. Yu H.M., Tang C.W., Feng W.M., Chen Q.Q., Xu Y.Q., Bao Y. Early enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition after resection of esophageal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Indian J Surg. 2017; 79 (1): 13–18. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1420-7. PMID: 28331260.
22. Ionescu V.A., Gheorghe G., Oprita R., Stanllie M., Dascalu R.-I., Zaharia O., Jinga V., et al. The outcomes of nutritional support techniques in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Gastroenterol Insights. 2022; 13 (3): 245–257. DOI: 10.3390/gastroent13030025.
23. Matthews L., Bates A., Wootton S.A., Levett D. The use of bioelectrical impedance analysis to predict post-operative complications in adult patients having surgery for cancer: a systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2021; 40 (5): 2914–2922. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.008. PMID: 33962360.
24. Lee G.H., Gho H.J., Lee G., Kim H.G., Wang H.J., Kim B.-W., Lee M.Y., et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis for predicting postoperative complications and survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9 (3): 190. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-5194. PMID: 33708817.
Review
For citations:
Simutis I.S., Yakovlev А.Yu., Levadnev Yu.V., Saveleva M.A., Blitsõn K.S., Perefilev R.S., Smorkalov A.Yu. Comparative Assessment of Equivalence of the Post-Operative Use of Two Amino Acid Solutions. General Reanimatology. 2026;22(2):15-28. https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2026-2-2687
JATS XML




































