Preview

General Reanimatology

Advanced search

Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-4-43

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the efficiency of cardiotropic therapy in neonates with severe posthypoxic myocardial ischemia and to improve severity rating criteria that would allow a differentiated approach to therapy for this condition. Subjects and methods. The efficiency of cardiotropic therapy was evaluated in 53 newborn infants with posthypoxic myocardial ischemia. Thirty (56.6%) neonates received phosphocreatinine in a dose of 30 mg/kg/day for 3 days as cardiotropic support; 23 (43.4%) babies had riboxine in a dose of 15—20 mg/kg. Results. The use of phosphocreatinine was found to be more effective than that of riboxine and to favor better blood biochemical composition parameters and lower ECG and intracardiac hemodynamic changes, which in turn reduced the time of mechanical ventilation from 11 to 8.25 days and that of administration of dopamine from 8 to 6 days, and its dose from 2 to 5 mg/kg/min. Conclusion. This investigation has led to the conclusion that there is a need for a comprehensive approach to diagnosing postischemic myocardial damages, including not only their clinical picture, but also a set of biochemical markers for ischemia and ECG and EchoCG changes on the 1st, 3rd, and then every 5—7 days and for the concomitant use of cardiotonic (dopamine) and cardiotrophic (phosphocreatinine) therapy; the administration of phosphocreatinine on intensive care unit admission (after prior hypoxia) as early as possible improves neonatal heart performance values. There are positive changes in both ECG and EchoCG and biochemical parameters (LDH, ALT, AST, De Ritis ratio). Key words: posthypoxic myocar-dial ischemia, neonates, phosphocreatinine.

References

1. Кичин В. В., Лихванцев В. В., Большедворов Р. В. и соавт.

2. Осипова Н. А.Антиноцецептивные компоненты общей анестезии и послеоперационной анальгезии. Анестезиология и реаниматология 1998; 5: 11 — 15.

3. Пасько В. Г., Руденко М. И., Андрюшкин В. Н., Нагорнов В. В.Регионарная анестезия при массовом поступлении раненых и пострадавших. Вестн. интенс. терапии 2005; 6: 69—72.

4. Мороз В. В., Васильев В. Ю., Кузовлев А. Н.Исторические аспекты анестезиологии-реаниматологии. Местная анестезия (часть 3). Общая реаниматология 2008; IV (4): 95—98.

5. Попов В. Ю.Варианты проводниковой анестезии плечевого сплетения у травматологических больных. Дисс. . к.м.н. Новосибирск, 1999.

6. Руденко М. И.Клинический опыт применения нейростимулято-ра при региональных анестезиях. Воен.-мед. журн. 2006; 327 (9): 33—37.

7. Ben David B., Stahl S.Axillary block complicated by hematoma and radial nerve injury. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 1999; 24 (3): 264—266.

8. Fanelli G., Casati A., Garancini P., Torri G.Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologic complications. Study Group on Regional Anesthesia. Anesth. Analg. 1999; 88 (4): 847—852.

9. Stan T. C., Krantz M. A., Solomon D. L. et al.The incidence of neurovas-cular complications following axillary brachial plexus block using a transarterial approach. A prospective study of 1,000 consecutive patients. Reg. Anesth. 1995; 20 (6): 486—492.

10. Brown D. L., Bridenbaugh L. D.The upper extremity somatic block. In: Neural blockade. Cousins M. J., Bridenbaugh P. O. (eds.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. 345—370.

11. МигачевС. Л., СвиридовС. В.Осложнения блокады плечевого сплетения. Тематический сб. «Регионарная анестезия и лечение боли». Москва-Тверь; 2004. 100—108.

12. Brown D. L., Cahill D. R., Bridenbaugh L. D.Supraclavicular nerve block: anatomic analysis of a method to prevent pneumothorax. Anesth. Analg. 1993; 76 (3): 530—534.

13. Moorthy S. S., Schmidt S. I., Dierdof S. F. et al.A supraclavicular lateral approach for brachial plexus regional anesthesia. Anesth. Analg. 1991; 72 (2): 241—244.

14. Partridge B. L., KatzJ., Benirschke K.Functional anatomy of the brachial plexus sheath: implications for anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987; 66 (6): 743—747.

15. De Andres J., Sala-Blanch X.Ultrasound in the practice of brachial plexus anesthesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2002; 27 (1): 77—89.

16. Perlas A., Chan V. W., Simons M.Brachial plexus examination and localization using ultrasound and electrical stimulation: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology 2003; 99 (2): 429—435.

17. Reed J., Leighton S.Ultrasound facilitation of brachial plexus block. Anaesth. Intensive Care 1994; 22 (4): 499.

18. Chan V. W.Applying ultrasound imaging to interscalene brachial plexus block. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2003; 28 (4): 340—343.

19. Chan V. W., Perlas A., Rawson R., Odukoya O.Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth. Analg. 2003; 97 (5): 1514—1517.

20. Ootaki C., Hayashi H., Amano M.Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: an alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2000; 25 (6): 600—604.

21. Sandhu N. S., Capan L. M.Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br. J. Anaesth. 2002; 89 (2): 254—259.

22. Retzl G., Kapral S., Greher M., Mauritz W.Ultrasonographic findings of the axillary part of the brachial plexus. Anesth. Analg. 2001; 92 (5): 1271—1275.

23. Casati A., Danelli G., Baciarello M. et al.A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology 2007; 106 (5): 992—996.

24. Reiss W., Kurapati S., Shariat A., Hadzic A.Nerve injury complicating ultrasound/electrostimulation-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2010; 35 (4): 400—401.

25. Klaastad O., Sauter A. R., Dodgson M. S.Brachial plexus block with or without ultrasound guidance. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2009; 22 (5): 655—660.

26. Williams S. R., Chouinard P., Arcand G. et al.Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block. Anesth. Analg. 2003; 97 (5): 1518—1523.

27. Kapral S., Krafft P., Eibenberger K. et al.Ultrasound guided supraclav-icular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth. Analg. 1994; 78 (3): 507—513.

28. Yang W. T., Chui P. T., Metrewelli C.Anatomy of the brachial plexus revealed by sonography and the role of sonographic guidance in anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1998; 171 (6): 1631 — 1636.

29. Arcand G., Williams S. R., Chouinard P. et al.Ultrasound-guided infra-clavicular versus supraclavicular block. Anesth. Analg. 2005; 101 (1): 886—890.

30. Soeding P. E., Sha S., Royse C. E. et al.A randomized trial of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus anaesthesia in upper limb surgery. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2005; 33 (6): 719—725.

31. Marhofer P., Sitzwohl C., Greher M., Kapral S.Ultrasound guidance for infraclavicular brachial plexus anaesthesia in children. Anaesthesia 2004; 59 (7): 642—646.

32. Liu F. C., Liou J. T., Tsai Y. F. et al.Efficacy of ultrasoundguided axillary brachial plexus block: a comparative study with nerve stimulator-guided method. Chang Gung Med. J. 2005; 28 (6): 396—402.


Review

For citations:


Sinitsin M.S., Azbarov A.A., Tsarev M.I., Apevalov S.I., Likhvantsev V.V. Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block . General Reanimatology. 2011;7(4):43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-4-43

Views: 1858


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-9779 (Print)
ISSN 2411-7110 (Online)