Use of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Cardiosurgical Patients
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-3-63
Abstract
Objective: to study the cardioprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) in cardiosurgical patients operated on under extracorporeal circulation (EC). Subjects and methods. Fifty-two patients with coronary heart disease (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 58.9±7.4%) operated on under EC and inhaled isofluorane anesthesia were examined. All the patients were randomized into two groups: 1) RIP; 2) without RIP. Central hemodynamic parameters and the plasma levels of troponin I, creatinine phosphokinase (CPK), and CPK-MB were estimated in the intraoperative and early postoperative period. Results. Before EC, cardiac index was significantly higher in the study group than that in the control one [2.31 (1.99; 2.5) and 2.05 (1.91; 2.25) bmin/m2, respectively; p<0.05]. Before EC, there was a significant increase in stroke index in the study group as compared with the control one [41.4 (34.73; 51.25) and 36 (28.87; 41.28) ml/m2, respectively; p<0.05]. In the study group, the significant excess was retained immediately after EC [40.89 (36.53; 42.15) and 35.14 (32.2; 37.24) ml/m2, respectively; p<0.05]. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in the concentration of serum markers of injury. Conclusion. A positive hemodynamic effect is observed when a procedure for RIP is used in patients with coronary heart disease during direct myocardial revascularization under EC at the preperfusion stage. Key words: remote ischemic preconditioning, troponin I, extracorpo-real circulation, myocardial protection.
References
1. Cameron D.
2. Kirino T., Tsujita Y., Tamura A.Induced tolerance to ischemia in ger-bil hippocampal neurons. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1991; 11 (2): 299—307.
3. NandagopalK., Dawson T. M., Dawson V. L.Critical role for nitric oxide signaling in cardiac and neuronal ischemic preconditioning and tolerance. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001; 297 (2): 474—478.
4. Cutrn J. C, Perrelli M. G., Cavalieri B. et al.Microvascular dysfunction induced by reperfusion injury and protective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002; 33 (9): 1200—1208.
5. Stenzel-Poore M. P., Stevens S. L., Xiong Z. et al.Effect of ischaemic preconditioning on genomic response to cerebral ischaemia: similarity to neuroprotective strategies in hibernation and hypoxia-tolerant states. Lancet 2003; 362 (9389): 1028—1037.
6. Stenzel-Poore M. P., Stevens S. L., Simon R. P.Genomics of preconditioning. Stroke 2004; 35 (11 Suppl 1): 2683—268
7. Raeburn C. D., Cleveland J. C., Zimmerman M. A., Harken A. H.Organ preconditioning. Arch. Surg. 2001; 136 (11): 1263—1266.
8. Kirino T.Ischemic tolerance. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002; 22 (11): 1283—1296.
9. Murry C. E.,Jennings R. B., Reimer K. A.Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986; 74 (5): 1124—1136.
10. Przyklenk K., Darling C. E., Dickson E. W., Whittaker P.Cardioprotection ‘outside the box’ — the evolving paradigm of remote preconditioning. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2003; 98 (3): 149—157.
11. Cheung M. M., Kharbanda R. K., Konstantinov I. E. et al.Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006; 47 (11): 2277—2282.
12. Gunaydin B., Cakici I., Soncul H. et al.Does remote organ ischaemia trigger cardiac preconditioning during coronary artery surgery? Pharmacol. Res. 2000; 41 (4): 493—496.
13. Venugopal V., Hausenloy D. J., Ludman A. et al.Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Heart 2009; 95 (19): 1567—1571.
14. Atluri P., Panlilio C. M., Liao G. P. et al.Transmyocardial revasculariza-tion to enhance myocardial vasculogenesis and hemodynamic function. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008; 135 (2): 283—291.
15. Nogueira C. R., Hueb W., Takiuti M. E. et al.Quality of life after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2008; 91 (4): 217—222.
16. Foussas S. G., Tsiaousis G. Z.Revascularization treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. Hippokratia 2008; 12 (1): 3—10.
17. Lattouf O. M., Thourani V. H., Kilgo P. D. et al.Influence of on-pump versus off-pump techniques and completeness of revascularization on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008; 86 (3): 797—805.
18. Laffey J. G., Boylan J. F., Cheng D. C.The systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery: implications for the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology 2002; 97 (1): 215—252.
19. Thielmann M., Kottenberg E., Boengler K. et al.Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass surgery with crystalloid cardioplegic arrest. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2010; 105 (5): 657—664.
20. Kharbanda R. K., Li J., Konstantinov I. E. et al.Remote ischaemic preconditioning protects against cardiopulmonary bypass-induced tissue injury: a preclinical study. Heart 2006; 92 (10): 1506—1511.
21. Przyklenk K., Bauer B., Ovize M. et al.Regional ischemic ‘preconditioning’ protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation 1993; 87 (3): 893—899.
22. Ali Z.. A., Callaghan C.J., Lim E. et al.Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2007; 116 (11 Suppl): 98—105.
23. Kanoria S., Jalan R., Seifalian A. M. et al.Protocols and mechanisms for remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel method for reducing ischemia reperfusion injury. Transplantation 2007; 84 (4): 445—458.
24. Hausenloy D. J., Yellon D. M.Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008; 79 (3): 377—386.
25. Сергиенко В. И., Петросян Э. А., Оноприев В. И., Лайпанов Х. И.Морфологические изменения лёгких при моделировании и лечении ишемических и реперфузионных повреждений конечности. Общая реаниматология 2006; II (5—6): 129—132.
26. Miura T., Tanno M., Sato T.Mitochondrial kinase signalling pathways in myocardial protection from ischaemia/reperfusion-induced necrosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010; 88 (1): 7—15.
27. Yang X., Cohen M. V., DowneyJ. M.Mechanism of cardioprotection by early ischemic preconditioning. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2010; 24 (3): 225—234.
28. Marber M. S., Latchman D. S., Walker J. M., Yellon D. M.Cardiac stress protein elevation 24 hours after brief ischemia or heat stress is
29. associated with resistance to myocardial. Circulation 1993; 88 (3): 1264—1272.
30. Baxter G. F., Marber M. S., Patel V. C., Yellon D. M.Adenosine receptor involvement in a delayed phase of myocardial protection 24 hours after ischemic preconditioning. Circulation 1994; 90 (6): 2993—3000.
31. Konstantinov I. E., Arab S., Li J. et al.The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies gene expression in mouse myocardium. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005; 130 (5): 1326—1332.
32. Onody A., Zvara A., Hackler L. et al.Effect of classic preconditioning on the gene expression pattern of rat hearts: a DNA microarray study. FEBS Lett. 2003; 536 (1—3): 35—40.
33. Simkhovich B. Z., Marjoram P., Poizat C. et al.Brief episode of ischemia activates protective genetic program in rat heart: a gene chip study. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003; 59 (2): 450—459.
34. Amr Y. M., Yassin I. M.Cardiac protection during on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: ischemic versus isoflurane preconditioning. Semin. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2010; 14 (3): 205—211.
35. Garcia C., Julier K., Bestmann L. et al.Preconditioning with sevoflurane decreases PECAM-1 expression and improves one-year cardiovascular outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 2005; 94 (2): 159—165.
36. Meng Q. H., Zhu S., Sohn N. et al.Release of cardiac biochemical and inflammatory markers in patients on cardiopulmonary bypass undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Card. Surg. 2008; 23 (6): 681—687.
37. Hausenloy D. J., Mwamure P. K., Venugopal V. et al.Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370 (9587): 575—579.
38. Venugopal V., Ludman A., Yellon D. M., Hausenloy D. J.‘Conditioning’ the heart during surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2009; 35 (6): 977—987.
39. Jenkins D. P., Pugsley W. B., Alkhulaifi A. M. et al.Ischaemic preconditioning reduces troponin T release in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart 1997; 77 (4): 314—318.
40. Li L., Luo W., Huang L. et al.Remote perconditioning reduces myocar-dial injury in adult valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J. Surg. Res. 2010; 164 (1): e21—e26.
41. Hoole S. P., Khan S. N., White P. A. et al.Remote ischaemic preconditioning does not attenuate ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction in humans. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2009; 11 (5): 497—505.
Review
For citations:
Lomivorotov V.V., Ponomarev D.N., Shmyrev V.A., Knyazkova L.G., Mogutnova T.A. Use of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Cardiosurgical Patients . General Reanimatology. 2011;7(3):63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-3-63
Views:
1202
Email this article 