Differentiated Treatment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Induced by Direct and Indirect Etiological Factors
https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-4-5
Abstract
Objective: to study the efficiency of respiratory, non-respiratory, and pharmacological treatments in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by direct (aspiration pneumonitis, bilateral pneumonia, or lung contusion) and indirect (abdominal sepsis, polytrauma, or hemorrhagic shock) damaging factors. Subjects and methods. The results of treatment were retrospectively analyzed in 185 patients (122 men and 63 women whose age varied 18 to 69 years) with ARDS resulting from aspiration pneumonitis, bilateral pneumonia, or lung contusion (84 patients, including 53 men and 31 women) or from abdominal sepsis, polytrauma, or hemorrhagic shock (101 patients, including 69 men and 32 women). The efficiency of a lung opening maneuver, mechanical ventilation in the prone position, Surfactant BL, perftoran, and their combination use in ARDS developing due to direct and indirect damaging factors was studied. Results. The study treatment modalities were ascertained to show varying clinical efficiency in patients with ARDS caused by direct and indirect damaging factors. Conclusion. The findings made it possible to substantiate the necessity of setting off ARDS induced by direct and indirect damaging factors, to develop and propose new approaches to the differentiated treatment of different forms of ARDS. Key words: acute respiratory distress syndrome, direct damaging factors, indirect damaging factors, thoracopul-monary compliance, lung extravascular fluid, respiratory support, mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure, lung opening maneuver, prone position, perftoran, surfactant.
About the Authors
V. V. MorozA. V Vlasenko
A. M. Golubev
V. N. Yakovlev
V. G. Alekseyev
N. N. Bulatov
T. V. Smelaya
References
1. Власенко А. В., Мороз В. В., Закс И. О.
2. Кассиль В. Л., Золотокрылина Е. С.Острый респираторный дистресс-синдром. М.: Медицина; 2006.
3. Мороз В. В., Голубев А. М.Классификация острого респираторного дистресс-синдрома. Общая реаниматология 2007; III (5—6): 7—9.
4. Ерохин В. В.Функциональная морфология респираторного отдела легких. М.: Медицина; 1987.
5. Голубев А. М., Мороз В. В., Лысенко Д. В.ИВЛ-индуцированое острое повреждение легких. Общая реаниматология 2006; II (4): 8—12.
6. Ware L. B, Matthay M. A.The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342 (18): 1334—1349.
7. Gattinoni L., Pelosi P., Suter P. M. et al.Acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease. Different syndromes? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998; 158 (1): 3—11.
8. Agarwal R., Aggarwal A. N., Gupta D. et al.Etiology and outcomes of pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute lung injury/ARDS in a respiratory ICU in North India. Chest 2006; 130 (3): 724—729.
9. Власенко А. В., Остапченко Д. А., Шестаков Д. В. и соавт.Эффективность применения маневра «открытия лёгких» в условиях ИВЛ у больных с острым респираторным дистресс-синдромом. Общая реаниматология 2006; II (4): 50—5
10. Kloot T. E., Blanch L., Melynne Youngblood A. et al.Recruitment maneuvers in three experimental models of acute lung injury. Effect on lung volume and gas exchange. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000; 161 (5): 1485—1494.
11. Riva D. R., Oliveira M. G., Rzezinski A. F. et al.Recruitment maneuver in pulmonary and extrapulmonary experimental acute lung injury. Crit. Care Med. 2008; 36 (6): 1900—1908.
12. Lim S. C., Adams A. B., Simonson D. A. et al.Intercomparison of recruitment maneuver efficacy in three models of acute lung injury. Crit. Care Med. 2004; 32 (12): 2371—2377.
13. Thille A. W., Richard J. C., Maggiore S. M. et al.Alveolar recruitment in pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: comparison using pressure-volume curve or static compliance. Anesthesiology 2007; 106 (2): 212—217.
14. Власенко А. В, Остапченко Д. В., Закс И. О. и соавт.Эффективность применения прон-позиции у больных с острым паренхиматозным поражением легких в условиях респираторной поддержки. Вестн. интенс. терапии 2003; 3: 3—8.
15. Demory D., Michelet P., ArnalJ. M. et al.High-frequency oscillatory ventilation following prone positioning prevents a further impairment in oxygenation. Crit. Care Med. 2007; 35 (1): 106—111.
16. Rialp G., Betbese AJ., Perez-Marquez M., ManceboJ.Short-term effects of inhaled nitric oxide and prone position in pulmonary and extrapul-monary acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 164 (2): 243—249.
17. Pelosi P., Brazzi L., Gattinoni L.Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur. Respir. J. 2002; 20 (4): 1017—1028.
18. Lim C., Kim E. K., Lee L. S. et al.Comparison of the response to the prone position between pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2001; 27 (3): 477—485.
19. Власенко А. В., Остапченко Д. А., Мороз В. В. и соавт.Применение Сурфактанта-BL у взрослых больных с острым респираторным дистресс-синдромом. Общая реаниматология 2005; I (6): 21—29.
20. Мороз В. В., Остапченко Д. А., Власенко А. В. и соавт.Эндобронхи-альное применение перфторана в условиях ИВЛ у больных с острым респираторным дистресс-синдромом. Общая реаниматология 2005; I (2): 5—11.
21. Власенко А. В., Остапченко Д. А., Розенберг О. А., Павлюхин И. Н.Эффективность сочетанного применения Сурфактанта-BL и маневра «открытия» легких при лечении ОРДС. Новости науки и техники. Серия Медицина. Выпуск Анестезиология и интенсивная терапия. ВИНИТИ РАН. НИИ ОР РАМН 2006; 3: 54—68.
Review
For citations:
Moroz V.V., Vlasenko A.V., Golubev A.M., Yakovlev V.N., Alekseyev V.G., Bulatov N.N., Smelaya T.V. Differentiated Treatment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Induced by Direct and Indirect Etiological Factors . General Reanimatology. 2011;7(4):5. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2011-4-5
Views:
1647
Email this article 